10 is the process of learning the associations between two events Ideas

Contents

Below is information and knowledge on the topic is the process of learning the associations between two events gather and compiled by the show.vn team. Along with other related topics like: in which type of learning do organisms learn the association between two stimuli?, the process of learning associations between a stimulus and a response is called:, Occurs when we make a connection or an association between two events, The process of learning associations between environmental events and behavioral responses is called, Through the process of learning you adjust your based on, in classical conditioning, organisms learn the association between two, voluntary behavior is best explained by which type of learning?, Conditioning is a process of learning associations true or False.


Conditioning – Introduction to Psychology – 1st Canadian Edition

Chapter 8. Learning

8.1 Learning by Association: Classical Conditioning

Learning Objectives

  1. Describe how Pavlov’s early work in classical conditioning influenced the understanding of learning.
  2. Review the concepts of classical conditioning, including unconditioned stimulus (US), conditioned stimulus (CS), unconditioned response (UR), and conditioned response (CR).
  3. Explain the roles that extinction, generalization, and discrimination play in conditioned learning.

Pavlov Demonstrates Conditioning in Dogs

In the early part of the 20th century, Russian physiologist Ivan Pavlov (1849-1936), shown in Figure 8.2, was studying the digestive system of dogs when he noticed an interesting behavioural phenomenon: the dogs began to salivate when the lab technicians who normally fed them entered the room, even though the dogs had not yet received any food. Pavlov realized that the dogs were salivating because they knew that they were about to be fed; the dogs had begun to associate the arrival of the technicians with the food that soon followed their appearance in the room.

Figure 8.2 Ivan Pavlov.

With his team of researchers, Pavlov began studying this process in more detail. He conducted a series of experiments in which, over a number of trials, dogs were exposed to a sound immediately before receiving food. He systematically controlled the onset of the sound and the timing of the delivery of the food, and recorded the amount of the dogs’ salivation. Initially the dogs salivated only when they saw or smelled the food, but after several pairings of the sound and the food, the dogs began to salivate as soon as they heard the sound. The animals had learned to associate the sound with the food that followed.

Pavlov had identified a fundamental associative learning process called classical conditioning. Classical conditioning refers to learning that occurs when a neutral stimulus (e.g., a tone) becomes associated with a stimulus (e.g., food) that naturally produces a behaviour. After the association is learned, the previously neutral stimulus is sufficient to produce the behaviour.

As you can see in Figure 8.3, “4-Panel Image of Whistle and Dog,” psychologists use specific terms to identify the stimuli and the responses in classical conditioning. The unconditioned stimulus (US) is something (such as food) that triggers a naturally occurring response, and the unconditioned response (UR) is the naturally occurring response (such as salivation) that follows the unconditioned stimulus. The conditioned stimulus (CS) is a neutral stimulus that, after being repeatedly presented prior to the unconditioned stimulus, evokes a similar response as the unconditioned stimulus. In Pavlov’s experiment, the sound of the tone served as the conditioned stimulus that, after learning, produced the conditioned response (CR), which is the acquired response to the formerly neutral stimulus. Note that the UR and the CR are the same behaviour — in this case salivation — but they are given different names because they are produced by different stimuli (the US and the CS, respectively).

Figure 8.3 4-Panel Image of Whistle and Dog.

Conditioning is evolutionarily beneficial because it allows organisms to develop expectations that help them prepare for both good and bad events. Imagine, for instance, that an animal first smells a new food, eats it, and then gets sick. If the animal can learn to associate the smell (CS) with the food (US), it will quickly learn that the food creates the negative outcome and will not eat it the next time.

The Persistence and Extinction of Conditioning

After he had demonstrated that learning could occur through association, Pavlov moved on to study the variables that influenced the strength and the persistence of conditioning. In some studies, after the conditioning had taken place, Pavlov presented the sound repeatedly but without presenting the food afterward. Figure 8.4, “Acquisition, Extinction, and Spontaneous Recovery,” shows what happened. As you can see, after the initial acquisition (learning) phase in which the conditioning occurred, when the CS was then presented alone, the behaviour rapidly decreased — the dogs salivated less and less to the sound, and eventually the sound did not elicit salivation at all. Extinction refers to the reduction in responding that occurs when the conditioned stimulus is presented repeatedly without the unconditioned stimulus.

Figure 8.4 Acquisition, Extinction, and Spontaneous Recovery. Acquisition: The CS and the US are repeatedly paired together and behaviour increases. Extinction: The CS is repeatedly presented alone, and the behaviour slowly decreases. Spontaneous recovery: After a pause, when the CS is again presented alone, the behaviour may again occur and then again show extinction.

Although at the end of the first extinction period the CS was no longer producing salivation, the effects of conditioning had not entirely disappeared. Pavlov found that, after a pause, sounding the tone again elicited salivation, although to a lesser extent than before extinction took place. The increase in responding to the CS following a pause after extinction is known as spontaneous recovery. When Pavlov again presented the CS alone, the behaviour again showed extinction until it disappeared again.

Read More:  10 the khmer empire was centered in what modern-day country? Ideas

Although the behaviour has disappeared, extinction is never complete. If conditioning is again attempted, the animal will learn the new associations much faster than it did the first time.

Pavlov also experimented with presenting new stimuli that were similar, but not identical, to the original conditioned stimulus. For instance, if the dog had been conditioned to being scratched before the food arrived, the stimulus would be changed to being rubbed rather than scratched. He found that the dogs also salivated upon experiencing the similar stimulus, a process known as generalization. Generalization refers to the tendency to respond to stimuli that resemble the original conditioned stimulus. The ability to generalize has important evolutionary significance. If we eat some red berries and they make us sick, it would be a good idea to think twice before we eat some purple berries. Although the berries are not exactly the same, they nevertheless are similar and may have the same negative properties.

Lewicki (1985) conducted research that demonstrated the influence of stimulus generalization and how quickly and easily it can happen. In his experiment, high school students first had a brief interaction with a female experimenter who had short hair and glasses. The study was set up so that the students had to ask the experimenter a question, and (according to random assignment) the experimenter responded either in a negative way or a neutral way toward the students. Then the students were told to go into a second room in which two experimenters were present and to approach either one of them. However, the researchers arranged it so that one of the two experimenters looked a lot like the original experimenter, while the other one did not (she had longer hair and no glasses). The students were significantly more likely to avoid the experimenter who looked like the earlier experimenter when that experimenter had been negative to them than when she had treated them more neutrally. The participants showed stimulus generalization such that the new, similar-looking experimenter created the same negative response in the participants as had the experimenter in the prior session.

The flip side of generalization is discrimination the tendency to respond differently to stimuli that are similar but not identical. Pavlov’s dogs quickly learned, for example, to salivate when they heard the specific tone that had preceded food, but not upon hearing similar tones that had never been associated with food. Discrimination is also useful — if we do try the purple berries, and if they do not make us sick, we will be able to make the distinction in the future. And we can learn that although two people in our class, Courtney and Sarah, may look a lot alike, they are nevertheless different people with different personalities.

In some cases, an existing conditioned stimulus can serve as an unconditioned stimulus for a pairing with a new conditioned stimulus — a process known as second-order conditioning. In one of Pavlov’s studies, for instance, he first conditioned the dogs to salivate to a sound and then repeatedly paired a new CS, a black square, with the sound. Eventually he found that the dogs would salivate at the sight of the black square alone, even though it had never been directly associated with the food. Secondary conditioners in everyday life include our attractions to things that stand for or remind us of something else, such as when we feel good on a Friday because it has become associated with the paycheque that we receive on that day, which itself is a conditioned stimulus for the pleasures that the paycheque buys us.

The Role of Nature in Classical Conditioning

As we have seen in Chapter 1, “Introducing Psychology,” scientists associated with the behaviourist school argued that all learning is driven by experience, and that nature plays no role. Classical conditioning, which is based on learning through experience, represents an example of the importance of the environment. But classical conditioning cannot be understood entirely in terms of experience. Nature also plays a part, as our evolutionary history has made us better able to learn some associations than others.

Clinical psychologists make use of classical conditioning to explain the learning of a phobia a strong and irrational fear of a specific object, activity, or situation. For example, driving a car is a neutral event that would not normally elicit a fear response in most people. But if a person were to experience a panic attack in which he or she suddenly experienced strong negative emotions while driving, that person may learn to associate driving with the panic response. The driving has become the CS that now creates the fear response.

Psychologists have also discovered that people do not develop phobias to just anything. Although people may in some cases develop a driving phobia, they are more likely to develop phobias toward objects (such as snakes and spiders) or places (such as high locations and open spaces) that have been dangerous to people in the past. In modern life, it is rare for humans to be bitten by spiders or snakes, to fall from trees or buildings, or to be attacked by a predator in an open area. Being injured while riding in a car or being cut by a knife are much more likely. But in our evolutionary past, the potential for being bitten by snakes or spiders, falling out of a tree, or being trapped in an open space were important evolutionary concerns, and therefore humans are still evolutionarily prepared to learn these associations over others (Öhman & Mineka, 2001; LoBue & DeLoache, 2010).

Another evolutionarily important type of conditioning is conditioning related to food. In his important research on food conditioning, John Garcia and his colleagues (Garcia, Kimeldorf, & Koelling, 1955; Garcia, Ervin, & Koelling, 1966) attempted to condition rats by presenting either a taste, a sight, or a sound as a neutral stimulus before the rats were given drugs (the US) that made them nauseous. Garcia discovered that taste conditioning was extremely powerful — the rat learned to avoid the taste associated with illness, even if the illness occurred several hours later. But conditioning the behavioural response of nausea to a sight or a sound was much more difficult. These results contradicted the idea that conditioning occurs entirely as a result of environmental events, such that it would occur equally for any kind of unconditioned stimulus that followed any kind of conditioned stimulus. Rather, Garcia’s research showed that genetics matters — organisms are evolutionarily prepared to learn some associations more easily than others. You can see that the ability to associate smells with illness is an important survival mechanism, allowing the organism to quickly learn to avoid foods that are poisonous.

Read More:  10 how did the revolutionary war change the meaning of freedom? Ideas

Classical conditioning has also been used to help explain the experience of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), as in the case of P. K. Philips described in the chapter opener. PTSD is a severe anxiety disorder that can develop after exposure to a fearful event, such as the threat of death (American Psychiatric Association, 2000). PTSD occurs when the individual develops a strong association between the situational factors that surrounded the traumatic event (e.g., military uniforms or the sounds or smells of war) and the US (the fearful trauma itself). As a result of the conditioning, being exposed to or even thinking about the situation in which the trauma occurred (the CS) becomes sufficient to produce the CR of severe anxiety (Keane, Zimering, & Caddell, 1985).

PTSD develops because the emotions experienced during the event have produced neural activity in the amygdala and created strong conditioned learning. In addition to the strong conditioning that people with PTSD experience, they also show slower extinction in classical conditioning tasks (Milad et al., 2009). In short, people with PTSD have developed very strong associations with the events surrounding the trauma and are also slow to show extinction to the conditioned stimulus.

Key Takeaways

  • In classical conditioning, a person or animal learns to associate a neutral stimulus (the conditioned stimulus, or CS) with a stimulus (the unconditioned stimulus, or US) that naturally produces a behaviour (the unconditioned response, or UR). As a result of this association, the previously neutral stimulus comes to elicit the same response (the conditioned response, or CR).
  • Extinction occurs when the CS is repeatedly presented without the US, and the CR eventually disappears, although it may reappear later in a process known as spontaneous recovery.
  • Stimulus generalization occurs when a stimulus that is similar to an already-conditioned stimulus begins to produce the same response as the original stimulus does.
  • Stimulus discrimination occurs when the organism learns to differentiate between the CS and other similar stimuli.
  • In second-order conditioning, a neutral stimulus becomes a CS after being paired with a previously established CS.
  • Some stimuli — response pairs, such as those between smell and food — are more easily conditioned than others because they have been particularly important in our evolutionary past.

Exercises and Critical Thinking

  1. A teacher places gold stars on the chalkboard when the students are quiet and attentive. Eventually, the students start becoming quiet and attentive whenever the teacher approaches the chalkboard. Can you explain the students’ behaviour in terms of classical conditioning?
  2. Recall a time in your life, perhaps when you were a child, when your behaviours were influenced by classical conditioning. Describe in detail the nature of the unconditioned and conditioned stimuli and the response, using the appropriate psychological terms.
  3. If post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is a type of classical conditioning, how might psychologists use the principles of classical conditioning to treat the disorder?

References

American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed., text rev.). Washington, DC: Author.

Garcia, J., Ervin, F. R., & Koelling, R. A. (1966). Learning with prolonged delay of reinforcement. Psychonomic Science, 5(3), 121–122.

Garcia, J., Kimeldorf, D. J., & Koelling, R. A. (1955). Conditioned aversion to saccharin resulting from exposure to gamma radiation. Science, 122, 157–158.

Keane, T. M., Zimering, R. T., & Caddell, J. M. (1985). A behavioral formulation of posttraumatic stress disorder in Vietnam veterans. The Behavior Therapist, 8(1), 9–12.

Lewicki, P. (1985). Nonconscious biasing effects of single instances on subsequent judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 563–574.

LoBue, V., & DeLoache, J. S. (2010). Superior detection of threat-relevant stimuli in infancy. Developmental Science, 13(1), 221–228.

Milad, M. R., Pitman, R. K., Ellis, C. B., Gold, A. L., Shin, L. M., Lasko, N. B.,…Rauch, S. L. (2009). Neurobiological basis of failure to recall extinction memory in posttraumatic stress disorder. Biological Psychiatry, 66(12), 1075–82.

Öhman, A., & Mineka, S. (2001). Fears, phobias, and preparedness: Toward an evolved module of fear and fear learning. Psychological Review, 108(3), 483–522.

Image Attributions

Figure 8.2: Ivan Pavlov (http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Ivan_Pavlov_LIFE.jpg) is in the public domain.

Extra Information About is the process of learning the associations between two events That You May Find Interested

If the information we provide above is not enough, you may find more below here.

8.1 Learning by Association: Classical Conditioning

8.1 Learning by Association: Classical Conditioning

  • Author: opentextbc.ca

  • Rating: 3⭐ (95949 rating)

  • Highest Rate: 5⭐

  • Lowest Rate: 3⭐

  • Sumary: Chapter 8. Learning

  • Matching Result: by C Stangor · 2014 · Cited by 2 — Classical conditioning refers to learning that occurs when a neutral stimulus (e.g., a tone) becomes associated with a stimulus (e.g., food) that naturally …

  • Intro: Classical Conditioning – Introduction to Psychology – 1st Canadian Edition Chapter 8. Learning 8.1 Learning by Association: Classical Conditioning Learning Objectives Describe how Pavlov’s early work in classical conditioning influenced the understanding of learning. Review the concepts of classical conditioning, including unconditioned stimulus (US), conditioned stimulus (CS), unconditioned response (UR),…
  • Source: https://opentextbc.ca/introductiontopsychology/chapter/7-1-learning-by-association-classical-conditioning/

Classical Conditioning: How It Works With Examples

Classical Conditioning: How It Works With Examples

  • Author: verywellmind.com

  • Rating: 3⭐ (95949 rating)

  • Highest Rate: 5⭐

  • Lowest Rate: 3⭐

  • Sumary: Classical conditioning is a type of learning in which an unconditional stimulus is paired with a neutral stimulus, leading to a conditioned response.

  • Matching Result: This learning process creates a conditioned response through … Classical conditioning involves forming an association between two stimuli, …

  • Intro: How Classical Conditioning Works, With Examples Discovered by Russian physiologist Ivan Pavlov, classical conditioning is a type of unconscious or automatic learning. This learning process creates a conditioned response through associations between an unconditioned stimulus and a neutral stimulus. Put another way, classical conditioning involves placing a neutral stimulus before…
  • Source: https://www.verywellmind.com/classical-conditioning-2794859

Read More:  10 is hamlet's inner conflict solved? if so, how? Ideas

What Is Learning? – OpenStax Psychology Revisions

What Is Learning? – OpenStax Psychology Revisions

  • Author: opentext.wsu.edu

  • Rating: 3⭐ (95949 rating)

  • Highest Rate: 5⭐

  • Lowest Rate: 3⭐

  • Sumary: [latexpage]

  • Matching Result: associative learning: form of learning that involves connecting certain stimuli or events that occur together in the environment (classical and operant …

  • Intro: What Is Learning? – OpenStax Psychology Revisions [latexpage] Learning Objectives By the end of this section, you will be able to: Explain how learned behaviors are different from instincts and reflexes Define learning Recognize and define three basic forms of learning—classical conditioning, operant conditioning, and observational learning Birds build nests…
  • Source: https://opentext.wsu.edu/ospsychrevisions/chapter/what-is-learning/

Unit 6 Flashcards | Chegg.com

Unit 6 Flashcards | Chegg.com

  • Author: chegg.com

  • Rating: 3⭐ (95949 rating)

  • Highest Rate: 5⭐

  • Lowest Rate: 3⭐

  • Sumary: Study Unit 6 flashcards. Create flashcards for FREE and quiz yourself with an interactive flipper.

  • Matching Result: The process of learning the association between two events. Two types of conditioning. Classical conditioning. Operant conditioning. Observational learning.

  • Intro: Unit 6 Flashcards | Chegg.comA systematic, relatively permanent change in behavior that occurs through experience.A theory of learning that involves observable behavior. It does not include mental such as thinking, wishing, and hoping. Occurs when an association is made between two events. The process of learning the association between two…
  • Source: https://www.chegg.com/flashcards/unit-6-648023f6-e2bd-4bcd-a0ad-a021f5b104a5/deck

20 Classical Conditioning Examples in Everyday Life Explained

20 Classical Conditioning Examples in Everyday Life Explained

  • Author: parentingforbrain.com

  • Rating: 3⭐ (95949 rating)

  • Highest Rate: 5⭐

  • Lowest Rate: 3⭐

  • Sumary: Classical conditioning is the process of creating an association between two different “stimuli” to create a new associative learning.

  • Matching Result: In this article, we will examine classical conditioning, the simple process of creating an association between two different stimuli to create …

  • Intro: 20 Classical Conditioning Examples in Everyday Life Explained What is conditioning | What is classical conditioning | Examples | Basics | Properties In this article, we will examine classical conditioning, the simple process of creating an association between two different stimuli to create new learning. What is Conditioning in Psychology…
  • Source: https://www.parentingforbrain.com/classical-conditioning/

Frequently Asked Questions About is the process of learning the associations between two events

If you have questions that need to be answered about the topic is the process of learning the associations between two events, then this section may help you solve it.

Is learning the connections between two events a quizlet process?

1) ‘Associative learning’ is learning that happens when an organism makes a connection, or an association, between two events –> Conditioning is the process of learning these associations. Learning is a systematic, relatively permanent change in behavior that occurs through experience.

What exactly does learning by association entail?

It is expressed as the modification of current behaviors or the development of novel behaviors that reflect the conscious or unconscious recognition of a contingency. Associative learning is the process by which organisms learn about relationships between events or entities in their environment.

Which two types of association learning are there?

Habitual conditioning, also known as Operant Conditioning, and classical conditioning, which is a more controlled form of conditioning, are two examples of associative learning that help us better understand the conditions of human behavior.

Which of the following best describes the procedure for discovering the connections between global events?

Learning A process that results in a relatively long-lasting change in behavior or knowledge as a result of previous experience. conditioning The process of learning associations between environmental events and behavioral responses.

What kind of learning involves repeatedly pairing closely spaced-apart events of different types to create associations between them?

Associative learning occurs when an organism makes connections between stimuli or events that occur together in the environment. Our minds have a natural tendency to connect events that occur closely together or in sequence.

Is association learning a type of learning?

In its broadest sense, the term has been used to describe nearly all learning processes, with the exception of simple habituation (q.v.). Associative learning is any learning process in animal behavior in which a new response becomes associated with a specific stimulus.

What three learning processes are there?

Each learning stage—cognitive learning, associative learning, and autonomous learning—is significant in its own right. By combining and using these three stages in a progressive manner to learn new information and skills, you can become a lifelong learner who moves at their own pace.

What three categories of associations are there?

Chance, causal, and non-causal associations are the three types of associations.

What are the 4 different types of learning?

While most of us may have a general idea of how we learn best, it often comes as a surprise when we learn what our dominant learning style is. There are four predominant learning styles: Visual, Auditory, Read/Write, and Kinaesthetic.

Which type of education teaches students how to link two stimuli with a reflexive action or emotional reaction?

In the classic example created by Ivan Pavlov, dogs produce a reflex response of salivation when conditioned with a sound stimulus. Classical conditioning is a straightforward form of associative learning, where the behavioral response is modified by conditioned stimulus.

Which of the following learning processes involves the formation of associations between two stimuli that happen sequentially in time?

The formation of an association between two stimuli is a key component of classical conditioning, as seen in the CS-US association between the word “No!” and the unpleasant stimulus of a collar correction.

What is a straightforward learning method that entails creating a connection between two stimuli?

In simple terms, two stimuli are linked together to produce a new learned response in a person or animal. This is known as classical conditioning (also known as Pavlovian or respondent conditioning) and was discovered by the Russian physiologist Pavlov.

is a kind of learning in which a connection between two stimuli is made?

When a previously neutral stimulus (like a tone) learns to be associated with a stimulus (like food) that naturally produces a behavior, the previously neutral stimulus is now sufficient to cause the behavior. This learning process is known as classical conditioning.

Share this post