10 social classes in colonial latin america were based on Ideas

Below is information and knowledge on the topic social classes in colonial latin america were based on gather and compiled by the show.vn team. Along with other related topics like: what role did the catholic church play in the colonization of latin america?, Latin American social classes in order from highest to lowest, What were the social classes in Latin America, explain how the spanish empire maintained a supply of labor in the latin american colonies., Social class in Latin America is closely tied to, name and describe the two economic systems of colonial latin america ., What events and ideas helped bring about revolution in latin america, Social classes in Latin American revolutions.

Class Structure in Colonial Spanish America | Encyclopedia.com

Caste and Class Structure in Colonial Spanish America

During most of the colonial era, Spanish American society had a pyramidal structure with a small number of Spaniards at the top, a group of mixedrace people beneath them, and at the bottom a large indigenous population and small number of slaves, usually of African origin. Although the size of these groups varied between regions and fluctuated over the course of three centuries, they comprised the hierarchy of power and social status during most of the colonial period.


The upper echelons of colonial society were dominated by Spaniards, who held all of the positions of economic privilege and political power. However, a sharp split existed between those born in Europe, “peninsulars,” and those born in the Americas, creoles. Although the relationship between these two groups was sometimes friendly, as when peninsular men married into creole families, it could also be antagonistic. Peninsulars sometimes perceived creoles as lazy, mentally deficient, and physically degenerate, whereas creoles often saw peninsulars as avaricious. In the sixteenth century rivalries between European-born and American-born friars for control of the religious orders led to violence that resulted in a formal policy of alternating terms of leadership between creoles and peninsulars. The Spanish crown’s preference for European-born Spaniards in government and church posts in the eighteenth century provoked deep resentment among elite creole men, who had come to expect positions of influence. Their resentment helped fuel anti-Iberian sentiment in the colonies before the wars for independence.

Creoles attributed greed to peninsulars because it was far more possible to make a fortune in the Americas than in Europe. Opportunities were present in retail and transatlantic commerce, in gold and silver mining, and in bureaucratic posts that offered opportunities to trade in native goods and exchange influence for favors. In the sixteenth century many peninsulars made their New World fortunes in order to retire in comfort in Spain, but by the eighteenth century, peninsulars were apt to enmesh themselves in the communities of the Americas.

The numerous opportunities for enrichment made the Crown tremendously reluctant to grant titles of nobility to creoles who became wealthy in the Americas. Thus, although there were many extraordinarily wealthy creole families, there were comparatively few creole noble titles. This lack of titles created one of the distinctive characteristics of Spanish society in the New World: In Spain a title of nobility clearly indicated an elevated social rank, but in the Americas there were too few titles to identify all the individuals with wealth and power. Nor were all the families that were ennobled by the Crown able to retain their economic positions, and this made noble titles uncertain guides to social status. Power and status depended far more upon the recognition of one’s peers than upon the external and readily identifiable labels of nobility, and the absence of noble titles contributed to a sense of shared status among all Spaniards. Although there were clear, though usually unstated, limits to ideas of equality between elite and nonelite Spaniards, the absence of noble titles and the small size of the European population relative to the indigenous population contributed to sentiments of equality.

Despite the common prejudice against laboring with one’s hands, many Spaniards did so, though unskilled labor was performed by Indians. Spanish craftsmen were employed for their skills, even when they were hired out on a daily basis. In rural settings Spaniards were likely to be the managers and foremen over Indians, who did the hard physical labor of planting, weeding, and harvesting crops.

Introduced to the Americas by the Spaniards, horses became symbols of European superiority; they represented wealth (for horses were not cheap), a superior physical vantage point, greater mobility and speed, and the superiority of European society. The horse and iron-based arms were the keys to many military successes during the Spanish Conquest, and were broadly considered to be indicators of the superior social status shared by Spaniards, from which all conquered native peoples and slaves were excluded. By Spanish statute, Indians and slaves were forbidden to bear arms, for military reasons. The enforcement of this prohibition was greatly assisted by the popularity of the belief that bearing arms, like riding a horse, was a prerogative of social rank and being Spanish.


Members of the intermediate racial groups were called “castes” or, in Spanish, castas. They included the offspring of black and white parents, called mulattoes; of white and Indian parents, called mestizo; and of black and Indian parents, to whom no single term was ever applied. The mestizos, mulattoes, and black Indians also intermingled and produced descendants of even greater racial mixture—part Indian, part Spanish, part black. No distinctive name was ever applied to these offspring; they were usually called simply castas.

Read More:  10 which hemisphere are both south america and antarctica found in Ideas

For the first 150 years of Spanish colonial rule the number of castas was relatively small, and racially mixed offspring were usually absorbed into the Spanish, Indian, or black groups. During this time only a handful were categorized as castas, and these were usually divided into either mestizos or mulattoes. About the middle of the seventeenth century, these groups began to develop an identity of their own. Instead of merely being people who lacked either the tribal affiliation of native peoples or the social prerogatives of Spaniards, they came increasingly to constitute groups in their own right. Women of these intermediate groups were more often employed than their Spanish counterparts, whereas the men were apt to be artisans, but journeymen rather than masters.

Racially mixed people were officially banned from positions of influence in colonial society. They could not sit on town councils, serve as notaries, or become members of the more exclusive artisan guilds such as the goldsmiths. They were barred from the priesthood and from the universities. Those designated as mestizos were exempt from the tribute payment owed by their Indian relatives, but no such exemption was granted mulattoes; even when freed, they were subject to the traditional payments of conquered peoples to their rulers.

The dramatic growth of the castas in the eighteenth century was an increase in sheer numbers of castas as well as a proliferation in the number of racial categories. From the simple divisions of mestizo and mulatto emerged categories such as the castizo, an intermediate position between Spaniard and mestizo, and morisco, the equivalent between mulatto and Spaniard. And the steady rise of intermarriages among the racially mixed population itself produced an enormous range of physical types, in turn generating a number of novel, often fanciful names for the sheer physical variety apparent for the first time in large numbers during the eighteenth century.


The Indians were a conquered people, and many of the earliest social distinctions regarding them, such as the payment of tribute, stemmed from their initial relationship to the Crown as conquered subjects. Spanish rulers exempted indigenous elites from payment of tribute and granted them the honorific “Don,” characteristic of the Spanish lesser nobility. But whereas such titles and exemptions from tribute were hereditary among Spaniards, these titles were held only by Indians who were incumbents. Because the offices they held were rarely hereditary—instead they were passed among members of the community, often by elections—the exemptions from tribute were rarely permanent.

Indigenous communities in the New World were overwhelmingly agricultural. Indians farmed land, either their own or that of Spaniards. Some resided in communities near Spanish settlements, others were forcibly removed and “congregated” near such settlements. In some regions Indians engaged in fishing or hunting. In the urban areas of the Americas, Indians were more apt to be construction workers (e.g., bricklayers, stonemasons), day laborers, or vendors of agricultural products.

In the mining regions of Central and South America, Spaniards used Indians to mine the gold and especially the silver found in regions located away from major population centers. Spaniards uprooted Indians, temporarily or permanently, and relocated them in communities near the mines. Slaves were rarely employed in the mines, and never in large numbers. Mining was the labor of Indians.


In the early years of the Spanish Conquest a great number of Indians were captured and enslaved on the Caribbean islands and nearby landfalls. Slavery was blamed by many for the devastation of indigenous communities, and the practice was outlawed by the New Laws of 1542, though natives who fought the Spaniards in frontier regions were often enslaved as late as the seventeenth century.

Following the devastation of native peoples in the Caribbean, blacks were introduced as slave labor. The largest number of black slaves arrived in the Spanish colonies between 1550 and 1650, corresponding with growth in the cultivation of sugar in Spanish America. But with the surpassing success of sugar production in seventeenth-century Brazil, the Spanish American industry shrank substantially, along with the number of imported slaves. In the nineteenth century, both the number of imported slaves of African origin and the sugar industry were revived in the Spanish Caribbean. But on the mainland, the numbers of imported slaves fell off sharply after 1650. In addition to the slaves in sugar-growing regions, there were a small number of slaves in the entourages of the wealthy and powerful in Spanish American capitals. These slaves were often pages, working in the urban homes of the well-to-do.

Between the middle of the seventeenth century and the end of the next century, the slaves of African origin disappeared as a readily identifiable social group in Spanish America. In some cities the African presence persisted into the nineteenth century. In the last years of Spanish rule, approximately one-third of the population of Buenos Aires was considered black, but by the end of the nineteenth century the percentage of Afro-Argentines had dropped to 2 percent. Nevertheless, their integration into the racially mixed population was central to the transformation of Spanish New World society in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries.


The longest running debates over eighteenth-century society in Latin America have concerned the nature of its economic and social transformation. Historians have long noted an increase in economic opportunities during the era. Increased silver production, growing domestic markets for agricultural products and textiles, and increased trade, both licit and illicit, produced unprecedented population and economic growth. This growth allowed many outside the traditional economic and social elites to acquire fortunes. There was a marked increase in the number of prosperous elites, accompanied by an unusual rise in the wealth of traditionally lower-status groups, including those of mixed racial ancestry. Historians have disagreed over whether Spanish society barred entrance to those with new wealth, particularly those of racially mixed origin.

Some historians have argued that there was a rigid social structure known as a society of castes (sociedad de castas), and they support their view with reference to the continuing legal and economic disabilities of natives and descendants of African-born people. Furthermore, they point to well-known paintings commissioned in the eighteenth century by wealthy Spaniards showing a proliferation of racial categories. These paintings depict the dress, food, and activity of various racial types in their homes. The paintings are arranged in a series of miniportraits that follow the order of a written or printed page, beginning at the upper left side of the page and depicting a family group sitting down to a meal in a well-appointed home. The label at the top of this miniportrait describes them in genealogical terms: “From Spaniard and Indian comes mestizo.” The next portrait portrays in equally favorable terms the intermarriage of mestizo and Spaniard, producing “castizo.” The third or fourth portrait begins the sequence all over again portraying a Spanish man and a black woman. But after two or three portraits of Spanish-black unions, reading from left to right, one gradually encounters a profusion of intermediate scenes, depicting various mixtures of Indian and black, often with highly fanciful names, such as “there you are,” or derogatory ones, such as “wolf.” The final portrait is often one of a poor hut, badly furnished, and depicting a woman with a frying pan chasing her husband. Not only is the lowest caste poor, but the paternalism of the Spanish family is inverted, and the woman dominates the man, thus indicating how far they are from the Spanish norm in the upper left. These portraits reveal the prejudice that accompanied the legal liabilities of various categories, and often have been cited as evidence of the difficulties of social mobility in the eighteenth century. However, newer interpretations have detected more creole pride and identity in these painting: Some scholars have suggested that some of the paintings subtly defend Spanish-American culture against European stereotypes and prejudices.

Read More:  10 how much bigger is the sun than the moon Ideas

Other historians have focused on the ways in which rigid legal categories and physical distinctions appear to have been overcome. In some cases racial categories were altered on christening records, and a humble origin could be overcome by reputation and wealth. The regional differences of Latin America appear to have had a bearing on such nobility. Some studies suggest that by the time Mexico achieved independence, several members of the titled nobility were mestizos; in Peru fewer such examples can be found.

The differences between the terms caste and class have been drawn more commonly by U.S. historians than by Latin American scholars. Their use as labels to differentiate open and closed societies was first suggested in the 1930s by the U.S. sociologist William Lloyd Warner (1898–1970). On the basis of his work and U.S. sociology of the 1950s and 1960s, the ways of distinguishing between a caste and a class society have focused on interracial marriage as the key to integration and the definition of an open society. As a result, much of the controversy generated by the dispute has centered on questions such as whether the Spaniards were intermarrying with members of the castes, which racial groups (castes) were marrying members of other groups, and what were the marriage patterns of the black community, which became integrated during the eighteenth century.

Among Latin American historians, class has been addressed in terms of the emergence of a bourgeoisie, or middle class. The question for many Latin American historians has been whether the individuals who profited from or led the economic revival of the eighteenth century should be considered members of an emerging bourgeoisie, and questions of a class society tend to revolve around the economic attitudes and behavior of the emerging economic elites. Latin American historians, and some U.S. historians of Marxist orientation, have been more apt to use the term feudal rather than caste to designate a closed society.

The final transformation of caste and class structure in colonial Spanish America came with independence. Peninsular Spaniards were officially expelled by many resentful creole communities. Tribute payments by native communities were suspended throughout Spanish America, either at independence or shortly thereafter. Slavery was usually abolished by the new republics within the first two decades of independence, except in the remaining Spanish possessions in the Caribbean, where it endured well into the nineteenth century. Men of mixed racial origin had access to arms and became skilled in using those arms against Spanish troops during the wars for independence. Arms and the horse remained symbols of power, but were no longer identified with Spanish rule and the caste system.

Throughout most of Spanish America, the close of the colonial era removed the rigid racial hierarchy that had lasted for three centuries. The legal distinctions of tribute payers and slaves disappeared, and in many regions, the superiority automatically conferred upon Spaniards gradually disappeared. In its place emerged a society also stratified by wealth and power, but one where those distinctions were no longer automatically registered by differences of race.

See alsoCastizo; Class Structure in Modern Latin America; Creole; Marriage and Divorce; Mestizo; New Laws of 1542; Peninsular; Race and Ethnicity; Slavery: Spanish America; Slavery: Indian Slavery and Forced Labor; Sociology.


Anderson, Rodney. “Race and Social Stratification: A Comparison of Working Class Spaniards, Indians, and Castas in Guadalajara, Mexico, in 1821.” Hispanic American Historical Review 68, no. 2 (1988): 209-243.

Bennett, Herman L. Africans in Colonial Mexico: Absolutism, Christianity, and Afro-Creole Consciousness, 1570–1640. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2003.

Chance, John K. Race and Class in Colonial Oaxaca. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1978.

Cope, R. Douglas. The Limits of Racial Domination: Plebeian Society in Colonial Mexico, 1660–1720. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1994.

Katzew, Ilona. Casta Painting: Images of Race in Eighteenth-century Mexico. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2004.

Lavallé, Bernard. Las promesas ambiguas: Ensayos sobre el criollismo colonial en los Andes. Lima: Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, Instituto Riva-Agüero, 1993.

Lutz, Christopher. Santiago de Guatemala, 1541–1773: City, Caste, and the Colonial Experience. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press, 1994.

Marín Bosch, Miguel. “Puebla neocolonial, 1777–1831 casta, ocupación y matrimonio en la segunda ciudad de Nueva España.” Ph.d. diss., Columbia University, 2004.

McAlister, Lyle. “Social Structure and Social Change in New Spain.” Hispanic American Historical Review 43 (1963): 349-370.

Mörner, Magnus. Race Mixture in the History of Latin America. Boston: Little, Brown, 1967.

Seed, Patricia. “Social Dimensions of Race: Mexico City, 1753.” Hispanic American Historical Review 62, no. 4 (1982): 569-606.

Seed, Patricia, and Philip Rust. “Estate and Class in Colonial Oaxaca Revisited.” Comparative Studies in Society and History 25 (1983): 703-709, 721-724.

Twinam, Ann. Public Lives, Private Secrets: Gender, Honor, Sexuality, and Illegitimacy in Colonial Spanish America. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1999.

                                        Patricia Seed

                                        Byron Crites

Extra Information About social classes in colonial latin america were based on That You May Find Interested

If the information we provide above is not enough, you may find more below here.

Caste and Class Structure in Colonial Spanish America

Caste and Class Structure in Colonial Spanish America

  • Author: encyclopedia.com

  • Rating: 5⭐ (213617 rating)

  • Highest Rate: 5⭐

  • Lowest Rate: 3⭐

  • Sumary: Caste and Class Structure in Colonial Spanish AmericaDuring most of the colonial era, Spanish American society had a pyramidal structure with a small number of Spaniards at the top, a group of mixedrace people beneath them, and at the bottom a large indigenous population and small number of slaves, usually…

  • Matching Result: Source for information on Caste and Class Structure in Colonial Spanish America: Encyclopedia of Latin American History and Culture dictionary.

  • Intro: Caste and Class Structure in Colonial Spanish America | Encyclopedia.comCaste and Class Structure in Colonial Spanish AmericaDuring most of the colonial era, Spanish American society had a pyramidal structure with a small number of Spaniards at the top, a group of mixedrace people beneath them, and at the bottom a…
  • Source: https://www.encyclopedia.com/humanities/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/caste-and-class-structure-colonial-spanish-america

Read More:  10 the image shows a hydrothermal vent. what would geologists expect to find around this vent? Ideas

Class Structure in Modern Latin America | Encyclopedia.com

Class Structure in Modern Latin America | Encyclopedia.com

  • Author: encyclopedia.com

  • Rating: 5⭐ (213617 rating)

  • Highest Rate: 5⭐

  • Lowest Rate: 3⭐

  • Sumary: Class Structure in Modern Latin AmericaThe class structures of Latin America are determined by the social relationships of basic economic activities. These relationships include property ownership, labor arrangements, forms and sources of income, and patterns of supervision and subordination, among others. Source for information…

  • Matching Result: Class Structure in Modern Latin AmericaThe class structures of Latin America are determined by the social relationships of basic economic activities.

  • Intro: Class Structure in Modern Latin America | Encyclopedia.comClass Structure in Modern Latin AmericaThe class structures of Latin America are determined by the social relationships of basic economic activities. These relationships include property ownership, labor arrangements, forms and sources of income, and patterns of supervision and subordination, among others. In addition,…
  • Source: https://www.encyclopedia.com/humanities/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/class-structure-modern-latin-america

The Casta System – COW Latin America

The Casta System - COW Latin America

  • Author: cowlatinamerica.voices.wooster.edu

  • Rating: 5⭐ (213617 rating)

  • Highest Rate: 5⭐

  • Lowest Rate: 3⭐

  • Sumary: Beginning in 1492, conquistadors from the Iberian peninsula arrived in Latin America. They encountered the indigenous peoples who had been living on the land for centuries and deemed them barbaric and uncivilized and themselves…

  • Matching Result: The Casta System was created in colonial times to explain mixed race families to those back in Spain but this racial hierarchy remained in place …

  • Intro: The Casta System Introduction Beginning in 1492, conquistadors from the Iberian peninsula arrived in Latin America. They encountered the indigenous peoples who had been living on the land for centuries and deemed them barbaric and uncivilized and themselves as superior and god-like. They then colonized the region, forcing all to…
  • Source: https://cowlatinamerica.voices.wooster.edu/2020/05/04/the-casta-system/

Race and Class in Colonial Latin America: A Critique – jstor

Race and Class in Colonial Latin America: A Critique - jstor

  • Author: jstor.org

  • Rating: 5⭐ (213617 rating)

  • Highest Rate: 5⭐

  • Lowest Rate: 3⭐

  • Sumary: Robert McCaa, Stuart B. Schwartz, Arturo Grubessich, Race and Class in Colonial Latin America: A Critique, Comparative Studies in Society and History, Vol. 21, No. 3 (Jul., 1979), pp. 421-433

  • Matching Result: by R McCaa · 1979 · Cited by 127 — That there were other hierarch pointed out in German Colmenares, Historia econ6mica y social de Colombi. (Bogota, 1973), pp. 408-460. 0010-4175-79-7015-3670 …

  • Intro: Race and Class in Colonial Latin America: A Critique on JSTOR journal article Race and Class in Colonial Latin America: A Critique Robert McCaa, Stuart B. Schwartz and Arturo Grubessich Comparative Studies in Society and History Vol. 21, No. 3 (Jul., 1979), pp. 421-433 (13 pages) Published By: Cambridge University…
  • Source: https://www.jstor.org/stable/178539

Frequently Asked Questions About social classes in colonial latin america were based on

If you have questions that need to be answered about the topic social classes in colonial latin america were based on, then this section may help you solve it.

What was the Latin American social structure during the colonial era?

Spanish American society had a pyramidal structure for the majority of the colonial period, with a small number of Spaniards at the top, a group of mixed-race people beneath them, and a sizable indigenous population and a small number of slaves, typically of African descent, at the bottom.

What social traits did colonial Latin America possess?

What were the social features of colonial Latin America? Major cities were established as outposts of colonial authority. Colonial governments mirrored the home governments. Precious metal mining for export was a significant component of the economy.

What were Latin America’s three social classes?

The Creoles, who were second class due to their Spanish ancestry, followed by the Mulattoes, who were third class due to their mixed blood, were the top class because they were thought to be pure bloods.

In colonial Latin America, which social class enjoyed the highest level of status?

Because they were born on the Spanish peninsula, those born in the Americas were known as peninsulares, and they were the most powerful elite in the Latin American colonies. Creoles were the next in line, and they made up only two percent of the population.

What kind of a class system did Latin America have?

The Casta System was developed by the Spanish during colonial times to explain mixed-race families to people in Spain, but this racial hierarchy persisted long after the Spanish had left Latin America.

What formed the foundation of Latin America’s colonial economy?

Silver and sugar were the continent’s two primary exports, which contributed to its wealth and prominence during the colonial era.

What primarily determined a person’s social status in the colonies of Latin America?

The Spanish had mixed-race children in the Americas with enslaved Africans and Native Americans. Status was determined by how “Spanish” one was, with those with little to no Spanish blood being in the lowest class.

Do social classes exist in Latin America?

Class can be seen influencing people’s sociopolitical interests in addition to its presence in the social structure and identities of Latin Americans.

Where did the system of classes originate?

The word class is etymologically related to the Latin word classis, which was used by census takers to classify citizens according to their wealth in order to determine whether they had to perform military service.

How were Latin America’s social classes split up?

Spanish-speaking people who were born in Spain made up the peninsulars; Spanish-speaking people who were born in America made up the Creoles; and Spanish-speaking people who were mixed with Americans made up the Mestizos.

In Latin America, what factors determined your social class?

The social relationships of fundamental economic activities, such as property ownership, labor agreements, sources of income, and patterns of supervision and subordination, are what shape Latin America’s class structures.

What criteria did Spanish social classes use?

As the years went by, they developed the system of castes, which was set up as a hierarchy of races depending on the amount of Spanish blood that each person had. They quickly began to create social classes between the colonial people.

Which factors determine social class?

People in the same social class typically share a similar level of wealth, educational attainment, type of job, and income. Social class refers to divisions in society based on economic and social status.

What four social groups made up the Spanish colonies’ social structure?

Answer and explanation: The peninsulares, Creoles, mestizos, mulattoes, Native American Indians, and slaves were at the bottom of the social hierarchy in the Spanish colonies.

Share this post